Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:32:50 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.co.uk>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101182131570.1639-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20010117110942.A917@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:37:36PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > > > On the assumption that linux uses block mode for all "disk" access > > > it seems like the correct thing to do. I'll verify that vmware > > > still accesses the cdrom device... md's and vn's aren't going to be > > > directly accessed by the linuxulator (are they?), rather accessed as > > > pre-mounted filesystems. > > > > Of course they are. From one of my old vmware2 configs: > > > > DRIVETYPE ide > > CYLINDERS 13328 > > HEADS 15 > > SECTORS 63 > > ACCESS "/dev/vn0" 0 12594960 > > In this case looking at D_DISK does the correct thing, doesn't it? If not, the bug is in the non-disk driver that set D_DISK :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0101182131570.1639-100000>