Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:20:44 -0500
From:      Tim Daneliuk <>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <>
Subject:   Re: Enabling A Serial Port On 6.2
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <44hcof9dkm.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan>
References:  <> <> <44hcof9dkm.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk <> writes:
>> But ... the entry did not end with a newline and init apparently thus didn't
>> recognize it.  Ending the line made everything happy.  I am submitting
>> this as a (very minor) bug, since I do not believe this to be correct
>> behavior (but what do I know ;) ...
> That's perfectly normal and age-old behaviour.  Part of the definition
> of a "line" of text is that it ends in a newline...

Hmm  - while I acknowledge that I've seen this problem before (I've used
some variant of Unix since the late 1970s and FreeBSD since 2.x), whether
it is "perfectly normal" is arguable.  I suspect that there are a great
many places - shell scripts and C source code leap to mind - where the
lack of a terminating newline at the end of a file does not cause the
line to be ignored altogether.  I rather think this is an "age-old" bug
that never got fixed because of its minor importance.  In any case,
i've authored a PR to make note of it.  If I ever get the time, I'll
dig into the source myself and see if I can figure out where the wheels are
coming off...

Tim Daneliuk
PGP Key:

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>