From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 17 02:43:33 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542CA16A41F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:43:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com)
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.197])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6D543D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:43:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com)
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so30580wxd
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=pFYxMNh4RIs/coCMfB2M1yMeME+jE2S3M2UumciyB49uTNVN88MwjvZLcqdYWUbfoCCzjXYiVnZkExynZfo6DTvtc+AvMvytw5dqTbSw1djgKSH7Gs9lYLQIeVv3dLS3ljqnq/13RYmBuDDokD0DQMTXBngmnMN2DkmwA0h8uFE=
Received: by 10.70.116.4 with SMTP id o4mr459822wxc;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.115.15 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <84dead7205091619435c12b528@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:13:32 +0530
From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050916225219.73b53cd0.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050914194612.15692485.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<20050914222013.178dc4dc.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<84dead72050914135239514c49@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050915000053.448f251b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<84dead720509160921732e7f96@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050916184911.38e2739a.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<20050916225219.73b53cd0.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: joseph.koshy@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:43:33 -0000

ol> Wow, that update to BETA4 did the trick! While running=20
ol> SCHED_4BSD:

Fantastic!  What is the profile like with the new 4BSD kernel?

I'm still puzzled as to how the ULE kernel managed to avoid
the bug.

--=20
FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy