Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.csrc/usr.sbinjexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030410111957.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Please take this to arch@.  Headers changed appropriately.

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > Whatever, path components should be path components.
> 
> You mean like this?
> 
> > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache
> net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit
> net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit
> net.inet.tcp.syncache.count
> net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize
> net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit

The answer to your question will depend on whether or not he likes the
sysctl namespace.  My question was different:  since jail already implies
a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace
for it?

-Nate

(Yes, I know jail > chroot in terms of features but at the end of the day,
you pass in a file path to start a jail.)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000>