Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      11 Sep 2001 17:10:41 -0400
From:      Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why, this is new (and BAD, BAD, BAD!!) ...
Message-ID:  <x7y9nlv3fy.fsf@yertle.kciLink.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010911113703.A22346@shaft.techsupport.co.uk>
References:  <20010911110508.A22305@shaft.techsupport.co.uk> <20010911032530.A6785@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010911113703.A22346@shaft.techsupport.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "s" == setantae  <setantae@shaft.techsupport.co.uk> writes:

s> Like I said, RFC1123 prohibits rejecting mail based on the HELO/EHLO lines.

So, if you combine all the RFCs on email, you're not allowed to reject
any spam at all.  You need to adjust the RFCs for reality; they don't
exist in a vacuum, nor can you follow them as if they did.


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x7y9nlv3fy.fsf>