Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:35:17 -0700 From: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r318576 - head/mail/sendmail-sasl Message-ID: <CAMuy=%2Bht9aHd6=NKMQC0e=HoKg0Nm3mw9M9qtzQdNoc3kxoPgg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130520154757.GA96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201305200715.r4K7FYmS057791@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMuy=%2BhxQ3RX6qFZcBHK9mn4%2B92SPq2LMnzSOHdg46i4YTAJaQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130520154757.GA96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>wrote: > > Since mail/sendmail was converted to optionsNG, shouldn't these options > be > > defined similarly with the new framework? > > Yes it should > > > > OPTIONS_SET= TLS SASL2 SASL SASLAUTHD > > No not that way OPTIONS_SET and OPTIONS_UNSET should never ever be used in > a > ports Makefile > > My apologies for this advice. I forgot that this can't be noted in Makefile. It was PORT_OPTIONS at one point that should be defined. > OPTIONS_SLAVE has been written for that > It does 2 things: > 1- it makes sure the options are activated in the slave > 2- it removes the specified options for the options the user can select. > Very nice. I haven't used this, yet. I do see the commit about this now, however has it been included in the Handbook or CHANGES? Sounds like it would be well worth an inclusion if not. Thanks bapt! Great addition. -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power to Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMuy=%2Bht9aHd6=NKMQC0e=HoKg0Nm3mw9M9qtzQdNoc3kxoPgg>