Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:21 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dan Foster <dsf@globalcrossing.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63192: mutt change breaks vim syntax highlighting Message-ID: <20040326044521.GA61327@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040326042741.GA16229@gblx.net> References: <20040324174642.GB18920@anyware12.anyware> <20040324181628.GB6200@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040326042741.GA16229@gblx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:27:41AM +0000, Dan Foster wrote: > This appears to be why vim developers will not commit the patch, and > they seem to be on solid ground with that position given the reasoning. Can you forward what they said? No need to spam GNATs with it. > So I would, therefore, like to politely request reconsideration of the > proposed vim patch for inclusion to the FreeBSD vim port or to have the > mutt patch-mktemp patch backed out. You forgot to CC the Mutt maintainer to see if he thinks we should keep the mutt patch. :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326044521.GA61327>