Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:50:04 GMT From: Bjoern Voigt <bjoern@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/104133: [ext2fs] EXT2FS module corrupts EXT2/3 filesystems Message-ID: <200901201950.n0KJo4Yw018999@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/104133; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bjoern Voigt <bjoern@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: vwe@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/104133: [ext2fs] EXT2FS module corrupts EXT2/3 filesystems Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:35:45 +0100 No, my system is a i386 system (AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+). I tried the suggested patch http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2009-January/005546.html together with FreeBSD 7.1. Unfortunately I also had to apply the patch http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124621 because I recently formatted my ext3 partitions with a nonstandard inode size (128 Byte) and mounting in FreeBSD is also possible with this patch. I worked some hours with the patched FreeBSD 7.1 system. Unfortunately the patched system also corrupted my system. During e2fsck run I found 626 lines of the form e2fsck 1.41.1 (01-Sep-2008) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 3457228, i_blocks is 8, should be 16. Fix<y>? yes [...] Inode 3457081, i_blocks is 16, should be 24. Fix<y>? yes Inode 3457098, i_blocks is 8, should be 16. Fix<y>? yes [...] Inode 3458451, i_blocks is 72, should be 80. Fix<y>? yes [...] Inode 3458672, i_blocks is 32, should be 40. Fix<y>? yes Inode 3458977, i_blocks is 8, should be 16. Fix<y>? yes So, I could not see, that the suggested patch fixes the problems. -- Björn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200901201950.n0KJo4Yw018999>