Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:59:07 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <rm@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Matthew Rezny <rezny@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r457264 - in head: graphics/mesa-dri graphics/mesa-dri/files lang/clover Message-ID: <c5613af0-c483-5b02-cc0b-339ec1d901a6@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5c290ac6-fbfc-3e25-79ee-ba0cda96e9b6@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712252330.vBPNUsm5049125@repo.freebsd.org> <20171226074052.GF27490@FreeBSD.org> <5c290ac6-fbfc-3e25-79ee-ba0cda96e9b6@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/26/17 08:54, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on 12/26/2017 10:40: >> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:30:54PM +0000, Matthew Rezny wrote: >>> New Revision: 457264 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/457264 >>> >>> Log: >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 Update the Mesa ports to 17.3.1 and switch to LLVM5 by d= efault >> >> Commit message is very terse and actually misleading: I don't see an >> option to select LLVM version.=C2=A0 Could one be added?=C2=A0 What is= the reason >> behind the switch? >> >> ./danfe >=20 > And more important, can it conditionally use clang/llvm from base=20 > system, if suitable version is available (on CURRENT f.e.)? The llvm dependency is, as far as I know, not optional and we need to=20 use the ports one, since the base one does not install shared libraries,=20 among other things. Also, in this way, we can depend on one version of=20 llvm, and test against it, for all versions of FreeBSD. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c5613af0-c483-5b02-cc0b-339ec1d901a6>