Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:39:20 -0453.75 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation progress Message-ID: <562553AE.6020601@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <20151019204335.89b83ff2eff7213ca5c36556@sohara.org> References: <56254484.8060003@hiwaay.net> <20151019204335.89b83ff2eff7213ca5c36556@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/19/15 14:49, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:34:38 -0453.75
> "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> wrote:
>
>> Well, I finally pulled the trigger on a ZFS install on my myth-TV
>> box-to-be and .... Everything basically worked, 2 glitches, but I got
>> worked around them & it is up & running, w/ 2X 1 TB 7200 RPM 2.5" HDD's
>> in an unmirrored pool, about 1.8 TiB total pool size. I am configuring
>> it now, & have a couple of questions. If I want it to be a NFS server &
>> export /home, do I just use that reference verbatim in my /etc/exports
>> file & crank the server or is there more to it ?
> You can do that, but just as ZFS has inbuilt support for managing
> mounting of filesystems by setting the mountpoint property it also has
> inbuilt support for managing NFS exports via the sharenfs property. Do one
> or the other - not both. I started out using /etc/exports and switched to
> ZFS properties for reasons I have now forgotten.
I just set sharenfs:
[root@mythbox, /etc, 3:25:23pm] 295 % df -h ; hddtemp /dev/ada[0-3] ; w
; pstat -hms ; uname -a ; hwclock -r ; date
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
zroot/ROOT/default zfs 1.8T 450M 1.8T 0% /
devfs devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev
zroot/home zfs 1.8T 208k 1.8T 0% /home
zroot/tmp zfs 1.8T 184k 1.8T 0% /tmp
zroot/usr zfs 1.8T 1.3G 1.8T 0% /usr
zroot/usr/local zfs 1.8T 9.3M 1.8T 0% /usr/local
zroot/var zfs 1.8T 624k 1.8T 0% /var
zroot/var/crash zfs 1.8T 148k 1.8T 0% /var/crash
zroot/var/db zfs 1.8T 3.1M 1.8T 0% /var/db
zroot/var/db/pkg zfs 1.8T 25M 1.8T 0% /var/db/pkg
zroot/var/empty zfs 1.8T 144k 1.8T 0% /var/empty
zroot/var/log zfs 1.8T 208k 1.8T 0% /var/log
zroot/var/mail zfs 1.8T 144k 1.8T 0% /var/mail
zroot/var/run zfs 1.8T 216k 1.8T 0% /var/run
zroot/var/tmp zfs 1.8T 152k 1.8T 0% /var/tmp
hddtemp: Command not found.
3:25PM up 5:29, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT
root v0 - 11:09PM - -csh (csh)
wam pts/0 kabini1.local 2:45PM 26 -tcsh (tcsh)
wam pts/1 kabini1.local 2:37PM - w
Device 1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity
/dev/gpt/swap0 16384 0B 16G 0%
/dev/gpt/swap1 16384 0B 16G 0%
Total 32768 0B 32G 0%
FreeBSD mythbox 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10
23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
hwclock: Command not found.
Mon Oct 19 15:25:30 MCDT 2015
[root@mythbox, /etc, 3:25:30pm] 296 % zfs set sharenfs=on zroot/home
[root@mythbox, /etc, 3:25:45pm] 297 % zfs share -a
However, when I try to mount the shared 'directory', I get the following
on the other box (also FreeBSD 9.3R, as it happens):
[wam@kabini1, ~, 3:33:43pm] 372 % lf /net/4256ee1/home/
/net/mythbox/home/ /net/q6600/home/; date
ls: /net/mythbox/home/: Operation timed out
/net/4256ee1/home/:
FTP/ ISOs/ archive/ pub/ rsync/ wam/ work/
/net/q6600/home/:
FTP/ ISOs/ VMs/ archive/ lost+found/
mnt/ rsync/ wam/ work/ zaliases.csh zaliases.sh
Mon Oct 19 15:34:02 MCDT 2015
[wam@kabini1, ~, 3:34:02pm] 373 %
& in my messages file:
Oct 19 15:19:40 kabini1 amd[31334]: get_mount_client failed for mythbox:
: RPC: Program not registered
Oct 19 15:19:40 kabini1 amd[782]: /net/mythbox: mount (amfs_cont):
Input/output error
Oct 19 15:20:33 kabini1 amd[31392]: get_mount_client failed for mythbox:
: RPC: Program not registered
Oct 19 15:20:33 kabini1 amd[782]: /net/mythbox: mount (amfs_cont):
Input/output error
Oct 19 15:27:47 kabini1 amd[31851]: get_mount_client failed for mythbox:
: RPC: Program not registered
Oct 19 15:27:47 kabini1 amd[782]: /net/mythbox: mount (amfs_cont):
Input/output error
Nothing in any of the log files on the myth-box. Pilot error, I'm sure,
but any clues appreciated. Thanks & TIA & have a good one.
>
>> Also, is use of tmpfs
>> compatible/OK w/ ZFS 'filesystem' ?
> Sure no reason why you shouldn't use both, except perhaps for
> memory pressure.
>
Fair amount of RAM here (16 GB), so I think I'll activate tmpfs, thanks.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
-- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?562553AE.6020601>