From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 23:24:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D6F16A4CE; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:24:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D4C43D1D; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:24:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0LNOXA8023326; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:24:33 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0LNOXYB023325; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:24:33 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:24:32 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Joerg Wunsch , current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050121232432.GA23273@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Joerg Wunsch , current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050121230949.GA34313@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050121230949.GA34313@VARK.MIT.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.8; VDF: 6.29.0.75; host: nagual.pp.ru) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (nagual.pp.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:24:34 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:24:35 -0000 On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:09:49PM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > Therefore, the errno issue is more about pragmatics than > standards-compliance. I think the two important questions are: > > o Is there lots of broken software out there that expects > errno to not be set? We have this errno setting since 2001, so any of broken software should already manifest itself but none I know of yet found. -- http://ache.pp.ru/