From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 6 18:00:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95016A418; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B6913C457; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp010-s [10.150.69.73]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout020/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id lB6I0jpF015366; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini-g4.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp010/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id lB6I0bPr011644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:00:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <87894.1196933745@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:00:27 -0800 References: <87894.1196933745@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES files options src/sys/geom/part g_part.c g_part.h g_part_bsd.c src/sys/ia64/conf DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:00:45 -0000 On Dec 6, 2007, at 1:35 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I was planning on removing the "change the partitioning by writing > through the 'c' partition" code in -current now, I trust that you > have not implemented that ? I have not implemented it. In fact, the c partition is not accessable by virtue of gpart not creating a provider for it. It's a purely internal partition. The raw partition can be accessed through the parent of the BSD label and that will take into account any and all permissions and re-tasting. > You are aware of newfs trying to change the partition type. I'm > not happy with how that is done and not really happy about it in > general, now that we have g_label. I'm not aware actually. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll take a look at it and see how it impacts things... -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com