From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 15:13:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD061065673 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21068FC17 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5AFDVIT076166; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:13:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m5AFDVVH076163; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:13:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:13:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20080610150536.GA67056@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20080610171129.K75322@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <484EACEB.7169.43FE1258@iwrtech.iwr.ru.ac.za> <20080610165435.M68290@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080610150536.GA67056@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, DA Forsyth Subject: Re: xRAID disks.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:13:36 -0000 x> hardware support. > >> actually there is not much need to have it for RAID-0/1/10 where there is >> almostnothing to process. > > For mirrors it can actually be a big win with hardware support. > If you use software RAID then you will have to perform each write twice > (once to each disk), in parallel > while with hardware support for RAID you only need > to transfer the data once. which saves at most 100MB/s bandwidth - compare this to 5-10GB/s in modern machines. If the controller resides on a PCI-bus together > with several other devices (which is not uncommon) then the reduced > bandwidth usage can be very useful. true. but not if it's builtin in chipset or on PCI express. there are really not worth price. unless you need RAID-5. but with todays disk prices it's better to just use RAID-1+0 and bigger drives. with software RAID you are not forced to operate on whole disks. usually not everything has to be mirrored.