Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 06:45:30 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci ti_fw.h ti_fw2.h if_ti.c if_tireg.h src/share/man/man4 ti.4 Message-ID: <00Aug25.064539est.115225@border.alcanet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20000823172642.T4854@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:26:42PM -0700 References: <200008240008.RAA67119@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000823172642.T4854@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >* Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.org> [000823 17:08] wrote: >> 1.6.2.3 +1089 -978 src/sys/pci/ti_fw.h >> 1.6.2.3 +2185 -1504src/sys/pci/ti_fw2.h > >ugh, isn't there a better way to do this? I second Alfred's `ugh'. Since the result is that v1.6.2.3 and v1.9 are identical, couldn't this be done by moving the RELENG_4 tag, rather than an explicit commit? (Maybe followed by a forced commit to explain what happened). The only downside I see is that we lose the cronological history for RELENG_4. Is that history worth ~120K repo bloat? (On a related bloat issue, why isn't the firmware treated as a KLD which is automatically loaded and unloaded by XXattach()?). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00Aug25.064539est.115225>