From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 13:50:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF5C1065708 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7615F8FC16 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1ADo4Nu066659 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1ADo4Cv066658; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:04 GMT Message-Id: <200902101350.n1ADo4Cv066658@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: John Baldwin Cc: Subject: Re: kern/95368: [kernel] [patch] Test for race between callout_drain() and softclock() generates false positive X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Baldwin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/95368; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, neelnatu@yahoo.com Cc: rwatson@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/95368: [kernel] [patch] Test for race between callout_drain() and softclock() generates false positive Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:45:01 -0500 At this point I do not think that a fix is going to be applied to the RELENG_6_0 branch. This bug is not present in more recent 6.x releases since they now use the spin lock directly with sleepqueues avoiding the need for the separate callout_wait_lock. -- John Baldwin