From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 17 19:28:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2018316A4CE; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:28:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A265943D49; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5HJP5jj040143; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:25:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:25:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040617.132522.102576979.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200406171247.04461.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200406152008.50656.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040615.210216.97064988.imp@bsdimp.com> <200406171247.04461.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: njl@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 bios.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:28:09 -0000 In message: <200406171247.04461.jhb@FreeBSD.org> John Baldwin writes: : On Tuesday 15 June 2004 11:02 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <200406152008.50656.jhb@FreeBSD.org> : > : > John Baldwin writes: : > : On Monday 14 June 2004 10:12 pm, Nate Lawson wrote: : > : > njl 2004-06-15 02:12:12 UTC : > : > : > : > FreeBSD src repository : > : > : > : > Modified files: : > : > sys/i386/i386 bios.c : > : > Log: : > : > We only need the devclass_find() result, not the softc. : > : : > : The devclass still exists if there is no acpi0 device due to 'set : > : hint.acpi.0.disabled=1'. Perhaps devclass_get_device() is more : > : appropriate than devclass_get_softc() though. : > : > The hint is insufficient to create the devclass, I believe. It exists : > because there's a node in the tree or could be a node in the tree. : > devclass_get_device() and checking to see if it is attached might be : > even better. : : The devclass exists even if there is no acpi0 device is my point. If acpi.ko : is loaded or compiled into the kernel, then the driver is going to be loaded : and the devclass added to the kernel's list. I think we're saying basically the same thing and arguing over how it gets there :-) Fetching the softc likely isn't the right answer. device_is_attached(dev) is likely a better way to go. Warner