From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 14 06:20:25 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA05296A;
 Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:20:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B89C01;
 Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:20:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id u10so7451351lbd.20
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=h/00Fi3hbfn+R5Vh5uhuiiNM3cR5WItIfJ800ZEMzuo=;
 b=lyZr0c7qG2IAmLY5iLBcLYQEom948wzLDISQcJXOGwRKu9vE8FdZRrKsv1uP2xt+h6
 ePpTEW9amgduszHze3IsWdUqNm4/n0JzcXKhx2IF/JULHKlxlRz9EqQvEqXGS/XgCnXb
 7h5xjGSKMKtnR34H69CivHaSnbI3hbsrMxHMjLjABVpRl9TfIHOlY/w4taid6gEx+6eZ
 5IND8NplU+rFDTg67Rqw12oRD3Xr3xPLImh1pgOegwN8u+1pkMfIz4/7ZL7oRiZ3cIUf
 3nI7FWXZrK/lCZcg4FCPEtRBpGFdVQ3XMSI4wv1QQC8pfdtiFyfDqAGhGfV3Utwvhv5i
 VNzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.198.166 with SMTP id jd6mr2969525lac.81.1413267621921;
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: crodr001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.131.66 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru>
References: <CAG=rPVe_JGy+eUiDjHaXXi5=n2mWGOeZjHkbVeUeS_m1z1_uMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:20:21 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VxNfv0aztQ3UC_s85B6VuD95lHI
Message-ID: <CAG=rPVcWVPZoG1=c3U2ArJLEH+dF2kPxkfihs4J872pH9LJ0mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:20:25 -0000

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@ipfw.ru>
wrote:

>
> On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
> Are there any tests results showing performance implications on different
> network-related workloads?
>
>
Alexander,

Do you have a testbed where you could run a quick network test for
non-virtualized workload:
   -> CURRENT without VIMAGE in kernel config
   -> CURRENT with VIMAGE in kernel config

and provide some results ?

--
Craig