Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:07 +0000 From: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au>, freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch for review: xargs standards compliance Message-ID: <20020316093507.B26394@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <xzpd6y4voj9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020315231100.A20942@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020316192629.A5254@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020316090004.A26394@FreeBSD.ORG> <xzpd6y4voj9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:40:26AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > Solaris not recognising that '' and "" are arguments is probably a > > difference in getopt implementations? > > No, Solaris' xargs specifically checks that the argument to -E and -I > is not empty. I have the source in front of me. Should we do this then? > BTW, '' and "" are the exact same thing - an empty string - as the > quotes are stripped by the shell before xargs is invoked. Yes, I am aware. /j. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020316093507.B26394>