Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:23:06 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure
Message-ID:  <20020711081715.R21520-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020710212942.GC4189@hades.hell.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

> The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a
> note that mentioned it.  But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like
> bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod.

It was "fixed" more than a month ago:

% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/gcc/c-format.c,v
% Working file: c-format.c
% head: 1.4
% ...
% ----------------------------
% revision 1.3
% date: 2002/05/22 16:37:09;  author: obrien;  state: Exp;  lines: +83 -6
% 1/2assed reimplementation of c-common.c revs 1.2 (-fformat-extensions)
% and 1.3 (printf0) for GCC 3.1.
% ----------------------------

The printf0 part always worked on i386's and doesn't seem to have any machine
dependencies.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711081715.R21520-100000>