Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:48:13 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com> Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: repocopy lam7 --> lam Message-ID: <20050122204813.GD4466@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 07:20:35AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hi; >=20 > According to lam's website: >=20 > "LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot = of > changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for > download only because some vendors still require it." >=20 > They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users. >=20 > I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to > lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of ei= ther > so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are > objections to this. I don't think this is likely to be worth the churn. It seems likely that LAM will be superseded by OpenMPI soon and will fade away. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB8rwMXY6L6fI4GtQRArVnAJ45r+21tYWOu+ZcqXWS09wLQD8XigCgsLMo vsX7Boh6AGCc6VUOOceSyMA= =8UD5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050122204813.GD4466>