From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 14:36:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029521065679; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9758FC1A; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywm39 with SMTP id 39so820734ywm.13 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dTtR5Nwkqd8jIlZbdnG4YJ1teoyCASol9UMhQ+G89DU=; b=RDPu+OiZZLD/R1VZWqL2DbwUrhLxi3VTWKM0n9ZqaeRY6XLeWxwq868HoSWtdFnMr9 u+uMhPdABixcZPeffwDHTHIoDxd7zaheBeR/K6R4fwUs0FdAlrnanFiduMaxUnRFRT6P wbIOSsNwFX1zoRUAp86XgCiHlMLDwbsLt5zrI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.76.8 with SMTP id d8mr7567155wfl.400.1312986997275; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.41.230 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:36:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201108091348.p79DmYFa095351@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110809135332.GA52137@over-yonder.net> <4E418DC6.7040708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:36:37 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Doug Barton , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Steven Kreuzer , "Matthew D. Fuller" , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc Makefile ports/textproc/ack Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:36:39 -0000 On 8/10/11, b. f. wrote: > On 8/9/11, Chris Rees wrote: > ... >>>> Would anyone object if I looked at adding danfe's grep suggestion to >>>> addport ? We have similar checks in rmport... > > No, provided that we can tell addport to skip the check -- I prefer to > look for matching distfiles and similar portnames or pkg-descr myself, > in a separate step, and I don't want to have to do it again. A separate step, that is, _before_ I've gone to the trouble of preparing a new port ... b.