From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 12:47:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A691F16A40F for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0477C43D4C for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5ED98.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.237.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8ACQVtv081381; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:26:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8ACls5Q045060; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:47:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:48:12 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Marcin Cieslak Message-ID: <20060910144812.6933ffd1@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <4503F8A2.1030104@SYSTEM.PL> References: <20060910123402.000e1358@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <4503F8A2.1030104@SYSTEM.PL> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wiki page about the current development status of the linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:47:59 -0000 Quoting Marcin Cieslak (Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:36:02 +0200): > Great idea! > > Now I can really understand what the state of things is, cool. > Should we somehow differentiate between 2.4 and 2.6 state of things? I want to differentiate. I want to - detect stuff which was wrong already - detect stuff which brakes when switching to 2.6 - detect bugs in the new stuff > I will try to have a look at some networking stuff (getsockopt, > bind02 looks like the easy one). Great. And if you or someone else have time to have a look at the remove() one, it would give the most bang for the bucks (I wouldn't be surprised if we have an errno problem here, which means it affects a lot of stuff)... I will be busy with doing the tests and updating the comments field today. Maybe I will also start a 2.6.16 test, but this depends on how much pitfalls (e.g. "reboot02" reboots the system unexpectedly) there are with the still running 2.4.2 test. Bye, Alexander. -- 'On whose authority?' demanded Wert. Trymon turned his grey eyes on him. 'Mine. I need no other.' (The Light Fantastic) http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137