Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 22:35:08 -0700 From: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, se@zpr.uni-koeln.de, ache@astral.msk.su Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, netbsd-ports@netbsd.org, owner-sparclinux@vger.rutgers.edu, pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net, Wally@RockyMountain.rahul.net Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull? Message-ID: <199510110535.AA26288@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"? (I know, > >} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package > >} anyway....) I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really > >} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the > >} change to go in. > > I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage > comparing to old version. > BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition. Wouldn't a complete port of HotJava to SunOS 4.1.4, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Linux be more in the tradition of BSD? I hate being SourceLess. -pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510110535.AA26288>