From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 15:32:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993D916A4CE; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:32:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3359D43D4C; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (adsl-68-124-233-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [68.124.233.133])i7IFWU5C089782; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:32:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4123768D.4000807@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:32:29 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harti Brandt References: <20040817084947.GB97542@ip.net.ua> <20040818120108.GA68772@ip.net.ua> <20040818143839.O872@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20040818143839.O872@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: re@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:32:33 -0000 Harti Brandt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > RE>On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:49:47AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > RE>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:13:27PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > RE>> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > RE>> > > RE>> > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > RE>> > > > RE>> > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:33PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > RE>> > > > > Hi, > RE>> > > > > > RE>> > > > > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. > RE>> > > > > Can someone please explain why ? > RE>> > > > > > RE>> > > > I think this is an omission from the old days. If it > RE>> > > > survives ``make universe'', this should probably be > RE>> > > > committed. Gleb, do you feel like testing this with > RE>> > > > ``make universe''? > RE>> > > > RE>> > > modules at least compiled on amd64 (with warnings in two of them). > RE>> > > haven't rebooted yet. > RE>> > > RE>> > and they load: > RE>> > > RE>> [...] > RE>> > unfortunately I neither do not have the resources for a make universe > RE>> > at the moment. > RE>> > > RE>> I'm testing the patch with "make universe" -- will take some time on > RE>> a 800MHz CPU. > RE>> > RE>Universe built; patch committed to 6.0-CURRENT. ruslan, will you ask for permission to merge to 5.3? > > Thanks. > > harti > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"