Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:02:36 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Don O'Neil <don@lizardhill.com> Cc: 'Bj?rn K?nig' <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Kris Kennaway' <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: 4.X Binaries on 5.X or 6.X? Message-ID: <20060227210235.GA19635@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <002a01c63bdf$b82a17f0$0300020a@mickey> References: <20060227204709.GA49399@xor.obsecurity.org> <002a01c63bdf$b82a17f0$0300020a@mickey>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:52:27PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote: > So, if you were me you _would_ install 6.0? Choosing between 5.x and 6.x is a no-brainer :-) You might actually like to wait a couple of weeks for 6.1 though, it has the usual assortment of bug fixes. > Any issues I could expect running my 4.X binaries? Should just work. Kris --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEA2jrWry0BWjoQKURAsSfAJ43rW2Ql5zpaigPMmO3bBdNZh22xQCeNb9f 4IoWsNXTpBgKvLvJqPJskEk= =dzBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060227210235.GA19635>