Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 19:12:23 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCI? Message-ID: <199512081812.TAA17039@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199512080911.KAA22802@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Dec 8, 95 10:11:26 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that J Wunsch said: > 18 * pb-F1.MCI.net (198.32.128.197) 578.146 ms * > 19 * * * > 20 * * * > 21 * * su-b.barrnet.net (192.31.48.201) 545.672 ms > 22 ucbn1.barrnet.net (131.119.2.2) 663.157 ms * 570.478 ms > 23 ucb2.barrnet.net (131.119.253.3) 677.627 ms * * > 24 cdrom.barrnet.net (131.119.70.134) 2815.803 ms * 3091.442 ms > 25 freefall.FreeBSD.ORG (192.216.222.4) 969.024 ms 863.106 ms * > > So it looks like MCI or something around it is flakey? My experience is that MCI is the worst major link in the USA. ANS is good, Sprint is not bad either but each time a route goes thru MCI, I begin to lose myriads of packets. It has been like this for a long time :-( -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #1: Sun Dec 3 14:34:17 MET 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512081812.TAA17039>