Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 21:54:38 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: math/lapack broken Message-ID: <20140802045438.GA30183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAHtVNLO1zEwvOj_G8VeCdc-b-GZxe08pxRMggv1jPfMNEzCNtQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20140802004717.GA29541@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAHtVNLO1zEwvOj_G8VeCdc-b-GZxe08pxRMggv1jPfMNEzCNtQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. > Its not the first message ranting about something broken. > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly the first poor decision. If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries and that option is selected, then I expect the port to build the profiled library. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140802045438.GA30183>