Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:10:08 -0600 From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> To: Aleksandr via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <8907C44D-15BE-4F1C-B2F9-8AADB4FFB1E4@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <20190909165653.4806f5643d6b46cc8ee21550@sohara.org> References: <7C016F5C-FEA9-4EF0-9F5C-D0838A6CD2FF@kreme.com> <20190909165653.4806f5643d6b46cc8ee21550@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:56, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> wrote: > It is perhaps worth mentioning the benefits of make missing to get a = list of dependencies before compiling a port so that you can minimise = what gets compiled by installing the dependencies first (make missing | = xargs pkg install -A) or thereabouts. Thanks for this, I had no idea this existed. Will read some man pages. > I rely on 'that which is locked came from ports=E2=80=99. Yes, going forward that will work fine, but starting off=E2=80=A6 not so = much. --=20 Personal isn't the same as important. What sort of person could think like that? And it dawned on him that while Ankh in the past had had its share of evil rulers, and simply bad rulers, it had never yet come under the heel of a good ruler. That might be the most terrifying prospect of all. --Men at Arms
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8907C44D-15BE-4F1C-B2F9-8AADB4FFB1E4>