Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:27:50 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <xzpznac8zfd.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:23 -0800") References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpfzc4ag3g.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes: > The new revision does. :-) So I guess that means the tenderbox run error > will go away on the next run (or two)? It should pull in 1.47 in time for the next run, which starts in ~2.5 hours. My personal opinion, should anyone care, is that we should fix the bugs rather than silence the warnings... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznac8zfd.fsf>