From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 15:56:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2652B0 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734671EFC for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB2FuEK7014353; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:56:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rB2FuDN7014350; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:56:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:56:13 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Julien Cigar Subject: Re: gmirror, gpart and MBR vs GPT in the Handbook In-Reply-To: <20131202103122.GN66981@mordor.lan> Message-ID: References: <201311301303210813.05DE187E@smtp.24cl.home> <201312011121580096.005D00FB@smtp.24cl.home> <20131202103122.GN66981@mordor.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:56:14 -0700 (MST) Cc: "Mike." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:56:15 -0000 On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Julien Cigar wrote: > If you want to use GPT with gmirror you may want to mirror each > partition instead of the whole disk. > > For example on my box I have the following: https://dpaste.de/Rb3S There are a couple of potential problems with that. The big one is when a disk fails and is replaced. If you're not careful, the rebuild of all those mirrored partitions will start at the same time. Head contention will bring that to a near-standstill. It also puts a heavy load on the drive that still works. Hopefully it is not the same model and age as the one that failed, or its "warranty timer" may also be close to expiring. A less-serious problem is that only the partitions are mirrored. That leaves out metadata like the partition tables and bootcode, but those typically do not change very often and might not be a problem. The admin has to remember to manually install such things on a new replacement disk, though.