Date: 29 Sep 2000 05:32:23 -0700 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Ports layout reorganization (Re: ports tree idea: Combine DESCR and COMMENT) Message-ID: <vqcem23idk8.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Neil Blakey-Milner's message of "Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:50:11 %2B0200" References: <39CD200B.A10214EA@glue.umd.edu> <20000923233215.A45139@mithrandr.moria.org> <39CD295E.453FF278@glue.umd.edu> <vqcsnqjin86.fsf_-_@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000929115011.A2522@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> * While I'm not adamant about it, I like the idea of combining files and * scripts. patches all begin with patch-*, scripts can be things like * 'configure', 'build', or PKGINSTALL, which don't conflict, usually, and * shouldn't be a hassle. I mentioned why I don't want to do that in the original mail. (I know, it was a little long.) === There are only 204 ports with scripts. I think we should leave those alone. I don't want to move them to files, as having "scripts" show up in the directory listing of the main port triggers a little alarm at the back of my head. (These scripts are often sources of trouble. :) === -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcem23idk8.fsf>