Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:14:10 +0000 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <200403240914.10447.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403231610210.49185-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403231610210.49185-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 00:36, Julian Elischer wrote: > The linker and dynamic linker are expected to 'plonk' snippets of > machine dependent code into whereever an access to TLS is being made, > depending on whether the access is to the same statically linked > module or another module, loaded at run time, or the 'main' module. > The "wheres" for these 'runtime code-insertions' are marked by the > toolchain. I'll take the dynamic linker if no-one else wants it. I'm not coming to the bay area to do it though :-). I've been seriously considering putting in symbol version support too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403240914.10447.dfr>