Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 19:36:25 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: ccsanady@friley585.res.iastate.edu (Chris Csanady) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth throttling etc. Message-ID: <199804250036.TAA04007@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199804250016.TAA01428@friley585.res.iastate.edu> from Chris Csanady at "Apr 24, 98 07:16:36 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Someone mentioned the linux stack earlier, and they do indeed use > contiguous packets. However, I think that they also use the generic > kernel allocator to create these. This seems like an easy way to > have per-interface buffers, although I have to wonder how efficient > this would be. Would this be acceptable? > Try looking at our zone allocator, which aligns items nicely, and is very quick. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804250036.TAA04007>