Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:51:12 +0200
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Cc:        pauls@utdallas.edu, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/bro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr	pkg-plist ports/security/bro/files patch-Conn.h	patch-Makefile.in patch-Obj.cc patch-Serializer.h patch-aux-scripts-Makefile.in patch-libedit::configure	patch-patricia.c patch-patricia.h ...
Message-ID:  <46EA4B80.9080604@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070913222236.GF17659@k7.mavetju>
References:  <200709101328.l8ADSDS6020847@repoman.freebsd.org>	<46E97E99.5030103@FreeBSD.org> <20070913222236.GF17659@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:16:57PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>  Added IS_INTERACTIVE to the port
>> Interactive ports are highly discouraged.  What is the necessity for it 
>> here?
> 
> The problem is that the installation script of the port itself (not
> the ports framework) asks a couple of questions. Normally when this
> happens you hope you can EOF the input and it takes some defaults,
> but here it keeps asking over and over and over.

Sounds like it needs to be patched to not do that but apply reasonable 
defaults.

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46EA4B80.9080604>