Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:55:29 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Charlie Schluting <charlie@schluting.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: firewalling with tunnels, and/or ipv6
Message-ID:  <20041221055528.GA27519@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <41C784DC.5020805@schluting.com>
References:  <41C784DC.5020805@schluting.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:05:16PM -0800, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> Ok, I've got a v6 tunnel, and to make it work I had to "allow ipv6 from=
=20
> <endpoint>" in ipfw. From what I understand, I have to make a completely=
=20
> different set of rules for ipv6, and load them using the -6 flag.
>=20
> Correct so far?

ip6fw is an entierly different beast from ipfw.  There is no -6 option
to ipfw.  Use ip6fw instead.  If 6.x we should have ipv6 support in ipfw
and ip6fw should be gone.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBx7rQXY6L6fI4GtQRAkBNAJ9R16Bhddf/JIvsRnxbUZAZEOOoeACgtP/N
d8KFGuf9ZPJIhLElywdb/tk=
=z2Fz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041221055528.GA27519>