From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 28 15:00:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DD916A420 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:00:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240A843D5C for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C28B80D for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:00:07 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6364140F-2C30-489B-9B38-BFF503F66499@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:00:06 -0500 To: freebsd ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: Re: Subversion 1.3.0-rc2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:00:08 -0000 On Nov 28, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Mischa Peters wrote: > It would also be nice to know why there is an RC in /usr/ports, and > why there isn't a subversion-devel tree. > Thanks to your earlier warning, I avoided upgrading subversion... I too also wonder about why stable port versions are replaced with pre-release software in ports. This seems like just a bad choice by the maintainer, but I'm not sure if it violates any policies of the ports system. Perhaps there should be some policy regarding stability of software.