Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:31:29 -0400 From: mikel king <mikel.king@olivent.com> To: Evan Busch <antiequality@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A quality operating system Trolling For A Quality Operating System Message-ID: <EC18DBBE-B0F4-41E3-80BA-00D36E159C3D@olivent.com> In-Reply-To: <CAC1X_0bP8SeyqMaR68AQPMzT%2Br-isv4h0bJPdtaF3377bQ%2BajQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAC1X_0bP8SeyqMaR68AQPMzT%2Br-isv4h0bJPdtaF3377bQ%2BajQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 20, 2011, at 12:47 AM, Evan Busch wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I make decisions about hardware and software for those who work with = me. >=20 > Talking with my second in command this morning, we reached a quandary. > Ron is completely pro-Linux and pro-Windows, and against FreeBSD. >=20 > What is odd about this is that he's the biggest UNIX fanatic I know, > not only all types of UNIX (dating back quite some time) but also all > Unix-like OSen. >=20 > I told him I was considering FreeBSD because of greater stability and = security. >=20 > He asked me a question that stopped me dead: >=20 > "What is a quality operating system?" >=20 >=20 > In his view, and now mine, a quality operating system is reliable, > streamlined and clearly organized. >=20 > Over the past few years, FreeBSD has drifted off-course in this > department, in his view. >=20 > Let me share the points he made that I consider valid (I have deleted > two as trivial, and added one of my own): >=20 >=20 {SNIP} > Fondly, > Evan I do not think it is worth wasting important list bandwidth on your = flame fodder. Therefore I dropped this off in a post to give it the = careful consideration is truly deserves -=20 Trolling For A Quality Operating System http://bit.ly/qUTAeh=20 Regards, Mikel King BSD News Network http://bsdnews.net skype: mikel.king http://twitter.com/mikelking
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EC18DBBE-B0F4-41E3-80BA-00D36E159C3D>