Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:56:15 +0100 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <1108749375.4084.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <12810328452.20050218175406@wanadoo.fr> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> <224383192.20050217213351@wanadoo.fr> <20050217123248.E42152@knight.ixsystems.net> <1843923725.20050218043504@wanadoo.fr> <20050218003848.A55934@knight.ixsystems.net> <12810328452.20050218175406@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 17:54 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Matt Olander writes: > > > please post elsewhere unless you have some advocacy information that we > > can use here for the FreeBSD operating system. > > I advocate the use of FreeBSD for servers. And you bash all others who seem to think it might have other purposes. Quit it, you're doing nothing better for the list.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1108749375.4084.53.camel>