Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 May 1999 15:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      andrewr <andrewr@slack.net>
To:        David Mazieres <dm@reeducation-labor.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        phk@critter.freebsd.dk, peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au, adam@homeport.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, provos@openbsd.org
Subject:   Re: Blowfish/Twofish
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96.990503152350.29864A-100000@brooklyn.slack.net>
In-Reply-To: <199905031554.LAA09846@reeducation-labor.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You could easily create an implementation of bcrypt that could not be
> used as a block cipher.  What exactly is magically blessed about MD5?
> MD5's compression function (or MD5 itself) functions perfectly well as
> a block cipher in OFB or CFB modes.  Is there some directive from the
> US government allowing the export of MD5 in source form?

Are you suggesting the use of MD5?  Im assuming it would be bad to use MD5
because it is much quicker for one to possibly crack users passwords.. 

-Andrew



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96.990503152350.29864A-100000>