Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:52:31 +0100
From:      Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
To:        Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc:        gore <koggybsd@comcast.net>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Horrible installer
Message-ID:  <56EE9CA1-8AFF-4FD5-A1DC-D33A3B3B45DC@my.gd>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70JUan=Tp6vLqsRe+X1h3pCebMJornjv=WE71rzRaksZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <BLU160-W54C133B8003EF140C41EF7AE860@phx.gbl> <4F180C83.9090100@my.gd> <4F19279F.6060303@a1poweruser.com> <201201202243.01861.koggybsd@comcast.net> <CAHu1Y70JUan=Tp6vLqsRe+X1h3pCebMJornjv=WE71rzRaksZQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help


On 21 Jan 2012, at 05:47, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote:

> I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and.... IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX!
> It blow chunks. It's a POS.  It's crap.  It is a joke.
>=20
> I hope I made myself clear. ;-)
>=20
> - M


Just because you see things a certain way doesn't make them a fact.
It's your personal opinion and other people's mileage may vary.

Since you're a fbsd user from 2.x, certainly you're WAY beyond needing the i=
nstaller and just unpack the base system + kern + src + ports and install th=
em manually.

Refer my earlier post on the subject.

Perhaps if you're unhappy with the new installer you should have submitted f=
eedback about it before -RELEASE hit the road.


Last but not least I find your calling the new installer a "pos" highly disr=
espectful towards the people that invested time, energy and money in it.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56EE9CA1-8AFF-4FD5-A1DC-D33A3B3B45DC>