Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 18:18:28 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed) Cc: danny@panda.hilink.com.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/3244: ipfw flush closes connections Message-ID: <199704121818.SAA27895@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <199704120228.CAA14395@veda.is> from Darren Reed at "Apr 12, 97 12:20:05 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Have you read my earlier e-mail? This occurs because if you leave out > > the '-q' option 'flush' says "Flushed all rules". But when the tcp > > packets come to be sent, and error "Permission denied" is return, so > > telnetd/rlogind quite, kernel resets connection and the rest of > > rc.firewall is probably not executed. > > Hmmm, if it returned EHOSTUNREACH, would that be as bad as EPERM ? > > Darren > Would seem closer to the truth. What other implications? Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704121818.SAA27895>