From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 17:36:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB1F10656CD for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735F68FC26 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1JjHjr-000Bzy-9N; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:36:07 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <72854627@bb.ipt.ru> <200804072321.19332.aline@riseup.net> <20080408120026.582326h7ubg7rd40@webmail.leidinger.net> <51403695@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408165737.21116ohrt6c8pt44@webmail.leidinger.net> <15726112@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net> <83563690@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408181137.20802c99svfzc9c0@webmail.leidinger.net> <85320614@bb.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:33:46 +0400 In-Reply-To: <85320614@bb.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Tue\, 08 Apr 2008 20\:35\:05 +0400") Message-ID: <08527093@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:36:08 -0000 On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:35:05 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:11:37 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:49 +0400): > > > Which engines you would like to see by default with f8? > > The one I use? ;-) > Sure! And it is... > > I don't know if it should be by default or with an extra port. By > > default would be more user friendly. Depends on the size maybe. We > > could have a look what is installed in the native gtk2-engines > > port(s). > Well, I just noticed that at a time of the port's (linux-f8-gtk2) > creation I've overlooked the existence of > gtk2-engines-2.12.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm package... I'll fix the port. Done. New version at the same place: ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/FreeBSD/linux-f8/test-f8.tar.bz2 (BTW from now it's a link to a versioned file, test-f8.2.tar.bz2 for now) Engines, which are installed (from gtk2-engines-2.12.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm package): ----- $ pwd /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines $ ls -1 libclearlooks.so libcrux-engine.so libglide.so libhcengine.so libindustrial.so libmist.so libpixmap.so libredmond95.so libsmooth.so libthinice.so ----- There are some other engines which exist at Fedora distribution: ----- gtk-murrine-engine gtk-nodoka-engine gtk-qt-engine gtk-rezlooks-engine gtk-xfce-engine ----- Should I include them by default? I'd say yes since they are light-weight. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve