Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:12:01 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yet another pkg bug? Message-ID: <53DC8F41.5080204@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/02/14 02:27, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. > > libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not > rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really > the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something > special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. > So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually > provided by libxslt. > > # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 > > Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. > > I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of > people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. > So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice > care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of > libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. > > I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be > safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. Thanks for the explanation. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53DC8F41.5080204>