Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 06:46:52 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxdoc Message-ID: <199606051146.GAA04621@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199606050233.CAA11953@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov> References: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960604212648.26610G-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199606050233.CAA11953@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov>, Sean Kelly <kelly@fsl.noaa.gov> wrote: > Chuck> Are there any other possibilities for discussion? >How about WYSIWYG tools? Having spent an inordinate amount of time trying to deal with the sheer non-greppability of WYSIWYG file formats and the absolutely hideous output of the ones that claim to produce human-readable output (what Microsoft's Internet Assistant and Word Perfect's HTML generator do is better left undescribed), I recently came to the conclusion that what FreeBSD is currently using... warts and all... is better. If Interleaf's so fine and grand it's an exception to this rather depressing rule, and they're going out of business... perhaps there's an opportunity there.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606051146.GAA04621>