From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 04:52:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD32B106566C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@too1337.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB028FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so2691723gwj.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.229.14 with SMTP id b14mr416456anh.155.1289017516062; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macmini.susnet (ip68-99-10-223.om.om.cox.net [68.99.10.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d15sm2387341ana.20.2010.11.05.21.25.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:25:13 -0500 From: Steven Susbauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:52:42 -0000 On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people > who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than > Solaris from using it? > > Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long > run, they make a lot more sense than assuming that Alejandro just wonders > if the CDDL is "dangerous" somehow. > I would be surprised. Oracle (real Oracle, not Sun) is still the primary developer of btrfs on Linux. They are pretty much going for feature parity with ZFS and want people to actually use it. If they start suing over ZFS patents which are certainly applicable to btrfs, it will have repercussions on that side.