Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:42 -0500 From: Michael Price <mprice@atl.lmco.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/lam lam.c Message-ID: <20010208123842.B4074@atl.lmco.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102090302160.7748-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 03:13:28AM %2B1100 References: <200102080649.f186n9C50045@gratis.grondar.za> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102090302160.7748-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 03:13:28AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Spaces after function names is not good, I agree, and the **argv --> > > *argv[] thing should happen. > > I hope you mean backing out of the *argv[] -> **argv thing. I normally > use **argv, but both style(9) and the ISO C standard use *argv[]. From a ISO C standard point of view, both int main(int argc, char** argv) and int main(int argc, char* argv[]) are just fine. This is purely a question of style. There is no ISO C issue. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010208123842.B4074>