From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  3 08:33:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802A416A416
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  3 Oct 2006 08:33:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com)
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9421743D5F
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  3 Oct 2006 08:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com)
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2760002pye
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
	b=Fs0RqfA0AA6km4xiQ5JTLksHJR+WPvyqwzGSR8zQMFJjj4THl6Xu3cE873ZZwZs1hxZkBXvV6UA6Tbk9MRt5ckz7krr1BjnNcUDVADLoc4iYAGZQgxx4G8KCXkBybquksWiLeVtmvVMcA0OZEaFAlOSdgITU8NvL6mXyQzApKI4=
Received: by 10.35.37.13 with SMTP id p13mr9409443pyj;
	Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ( [133.11.172.102])
	by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm957699nzo.2006.10.03.01.33.22;
	Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:33:03 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20061003.173303.32717938.chat95@mac.com>
To: mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <200610030655.48573.mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm>
References: <200610021051.k92ApQTL099708@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20061003.094837.118629176.chat95@mac.com>
	<200610030655.48573.mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Maho NAKATA <maho.nakata@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/103896: OO.o port should add <OO_DIR>/program to
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:33:26 -0000

From: Mihnea Capraru <mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: ports/103896: OO.o port should add <OO_DIR>/program to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:55:48 +0000

> Right. What I meant is that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set automatically when 
> running a UNO application written in Java that needs to bootstrap 
> OpenOffice.org. Since soffice would only be run at this point (at bootstrap), 
> the JVM will never even be able to find soffice 
> in /usr/local/openoffice-***/program, because this entry would only be added 
> to LD_LIBRARY_PATH by soffice itself (and this is circular).
> 
> This is why I was suggesting to update system-wide LD_LIBRARY_PATH. But if 
> this is considered too intrusive, then perhaps install a symlink to soffice 
> in /usr/local/lib (libexec?). 	

First of all adding LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmful.
Such patch (simply adding globally LD_LIBRARY_PATH) will never be integrated.
And I think if we use $ORIGIN, such kind of problem will disapper.
Currently we are working at this implementation. Hope 6.3 will include
this.

thanks,
-- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)