Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:18:45 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@freebsd.org>, stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE i386 can not build a kernel? Message-ID: <201902281318.x1SDIjOn056480@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DzKF3Kxid91d73hW7PMO6dJ4K=OmZNPKpmyC9_%2BHgHMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 03:50, Rodney W. Grimes > <freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > Now the begging question, why isnt the toolchain as shipped > > already properly built? > > The required toolchain is included in 12.0-RELEASE i386 - the linker > is /usr/bin/ld.lld. It just needs to be specified explicitly if build > via a method other than make buildworld or kernel-toolchain followed > by buildkernel. Why is this not included in the /usr/src; make buildkernel target? > > I wanted to ship 12.0 i386 with lld as /usr/bin/ld, but held off on re > and portmgr's advice due to ports fallout. Is there a release note item describing that kernel building now requires specical procedures to build a kernel? This is a POLA issue. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201902281318.x1SDIjOn056480>