From owner-cvs-all  Sun Nov  5 17:53:12 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 062D637B479; Sun,  5 Nov 2000 17:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eA61qwI08561;
	Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:52:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: "John W. De Boskey" <jwd@bsdwins.com>
Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>,
	"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile 
In-Reply-To: Message from "John W. De Boskey" <jwd@bsdwins.com> 
   of "Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:36:52 EST." <20001105193652.A14868@bsdwins.com> 
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 17:52:58 -0800
Message-ID: <8558.973475578@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>    I have to agree with David. I have code which depends on these
> values at the end of the world/release logs.

Well, like I said, I wouldn't mind moving it back to the end, just
so long as there aren't two of them.

>    May I be so bold to ask where this was discussed beforehand?
> I'd like to see other folks' pros and cons.

Well, it wasn't, but seeing as I was the one who stuck those timing
messages in there in the first place, I didn't think anybody else felt
too strongly about it besides myself. :-)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message