From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep  9 19:08:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA06308
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 19:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA06302
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 19:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA01860; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 19:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Grrr. NFS to a Sun (Slowaris 5.5.1) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Sep 1996 17:33:16 EDT."
             <199609092133.RAA01021@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 19:07:54 -0700
Message-ID: <1858.842321274@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> What I dont understand is if no one is working on NFS, how is it going
> downhill?   I mean, cant we just revert back to the NFS that was in 0612, it
> seemed to work very well.

I think it's more a question of dependencies.  You don't need to
change *anything* in the NFS code to make it break, after all, there
being so many other things it depends on which can change.

						Jordan